<html dir="ltr"><head></head><body style="text-align:left; direction:ltr;"><div>Just an update...</div><div><br></div><div>I've moved the <a href="https://opensource.org/licenses/CUA-OPL-1.0">CUA Office Public License Version 1.0 (CUA-OPL-1.0)</a> from, "Non-reusable licenses" to. "Licenses that have been voluntarily retired" (<a href="https://opensource.org/licenses/category">https://opensource.org/licenses/category</a>) and added the standard text, "The CUA Office Project has ceased to use or recommend this license."</div><div><br></div><div>Patrick</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>On Mon, 2018-10-15 at 11:39 +0100, Simon Phipps wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Thanks for this, Matija. The Board voted last week to accept this proposal.<div><br></div><div>S.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 7:39 AM Matija Šuklje <<a href="mailto:matija@suklje.name">matija@suklje.name</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear all,<br>
<br>
I’ve stumbled upon CUA-OPL-1.0 lately and found it to be <br>
essentially a rebranded MPL-1.1 with some stylistic changes <br>
(different style of bullet points) and a different name. Even <br>
Exhibit A is in both cases the same.<br>
<br>
It seems the CUA Office project lead has already in 2008 requested <br>
that OSI retire CUA-OPL-1.0, but it seems there was no follow-up <br>
on this:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2008-April/000201.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2008-April/000201.html</a><br>
<br>
It seems to me that after a decade after the (only?) project to <br>
use it, it would be high time to retire this license to avoid <br>
confusion with MPL-1.1.<br>
<br>
Or is there any good reason to keep it?<br>
<br>
I have also requested to pull it from SPDX:<br>
<a href="https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/690" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/690</a><br>
<br>
<br>
cheers,<br>
Matija Šuklje<br></blockquote></div><div><br></div><pre>_______________________________________________</pre><pre>License-review mailing list</pre><pre><a href="mailto:License-review@lists.opensource.org">License-review@lists.opensource.org</a></pre><pre><a href="http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org">http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org</a></pre><pre><br></pre></div></blockquote><div><span><pre>-- <br></pre><div> || | | || | || || | || | ||| | ||| </div><div><br></div><div>Patrick Masson</div><div>General Manager & Director, Open Source Initiative</div><div>855 El Camino Real, Ste 13A, #270</div><div>Palo Alto, CA 94301</div><div>United States</div><div>Office: (415) 857-5398</div><div>Mobile: (970) 4MASSON</div><div>Freenode: OSIMasson</div><div>Email: <a href="mailto:masson@opensource.org">masson@opensource.org</a></div><div>Website: <a href="http://www.opensource.org">www.opensource.org</a></div></span></div></body></html>