<div dir="ltr"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 5:00 AM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:license-review-request@opensource.org" target="_blank">license-review-request@opensource.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Send License-review mailing list submissions to<br>
<a href="mailto:license-review@opensource.org">license-review@opensource.org</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-review" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.opensource.org/<wbr>cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/<wbr>license-review</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:license-review-request@opensource.org">license-review-request@<wbr>opensource.org</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a href="mailto:license-review-owner@opensource.org">license-review-owner@<wbr>opensource.org</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of License-review digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. License committee report - August 2017 (Richard Fontana)<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<wbr>------------------------------<wbr>----------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 18:07:37 -0400<br>
From: Richard Fontana <<a href="mailto:fontana@opensource.org">fontana@opensource.org</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:license-review@opensource.org">license-review@opensource.org</a><br>
Subject: [License-review] License committee report - August 2017<br>
Message-ID: <20170806220737.GA2673@<wbr>clifford.lan><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii<br>
<br>
Reference is made to the previous report<br>
(<a href="https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2017-July/003056.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.opensource.org/<wbr>pipermail/license-review/2017-<wbr>July/003056.html</a>).<br>
No updates to submitted licenses still under consideration apart from<br>
what is said here.<br>
<br>
Eclipse Public License version 2.0<br>
==============================<wbr>====<br>
<br>
Submission:<br>
<a href="https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2017-June/003048.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.opensource.org/<wbr>pipermail/license-review/2017-<wbr>June/003048.html</a><br>
<br>
Comments: No feedback from the list on EPL 2.0 in the past month.<br>
<br>
Recommendation: Approval, unless someone raises an objection over the<br>
next few days.<br>
<br>
Hooyami License Version 1.0<br>
===========================<br>
<br>
Submission: <a href="https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2017-July/003058.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.opensource.org/<wbr>pipermail/license-review/2017-<wbr>July/003058.html</a><br>
and see the followup from the submitter:<br>
<a href="https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2017-July/003065.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.opensource.org/<wbr>pipermail/license-review/2017-<wbr>July/003065.html</a><br>
<br>
Comments: Reaction has been negative, both on textual clarity and<br>
proliferation grounds.<br>
<br>
Recommendation: No action at this time, but I encourage the submitter<br>
to withdraw the submission in its current form and consider using an<br>
existing OSI-approved license, such as the MIT license.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Subject: Digest Footer<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
License-review mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:License-review@opensource.org">License-review@opensource.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-review" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.opensource.org/<wbr>cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/<wbr>license-review</a><br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
End of License-review Digest, Vol 59, Issue 2<br>
******************************<wbr>***************<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>