Hi Luis,<div>Please, just make sure that the CeCILL approved version will be the last one, submitted by Patrick Moreau on <i style="font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:medium">Mon Mar 11 19:33:39 UTC 2013</i></div>
<div>URL: <a href="http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2013-March/000539.html">http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2013-March/000539.html</a></div><div><br></div><div>It includes interoperability with the EUPLv1.2, which includes interoperability with CeCILL 2.1.</div>
<div>Kind regards,</div><div>Patrice-Emmanuel</div><div><br></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">2013/3/28 Luis Villa <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:luis@tieguy.org" target="_blank">luis@tieguy.org</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">This email is my report for licenses currently submitted to the OSI.<br>
If anybody disagrees with my assessment of the list's comments or<br>
conclusions, please say so before the meeting of April 3rd.<br>
<br>
CeCILL 2.1<br>
========<br>
<br>
Submission: <a href="http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2012-May/000414.html" target="_blank">http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2012-May/000414.html</a><br>
<br>
Comments: Several clarifying questions were asked, indicating the<br>
license had been read, but no list members challenged the OSD<br>
compliance of the license itself.<br>
<br>
Recommendation: Board should approve.<br>
<br>
EUPL 1.2<br>
=======<br>
<br>
Submission: <a href="http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2013-March/000540.html" target="_blank">http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2013-March/000540.html</a><br>
<br>
Comments: John Cowan reviewed the changes to the (earlier-approved)<br>
versions of the EUPL, and found nothing objectionable.<br>
<br>
Recommendation: Board should approve.<br>
<br>
MOSL (working draft 3)<br>
=================<br>
Submission: <a href="http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2013-January/000505.html" target="_blank">http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2013-January/000505.html</a><br>
<br>
Comments: Richard Fontana and Bruce Perens objected to current<br>
language on redistribution as a violation of OSD 9.<br>
<br>
Recommendation: Not accept at this time.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
License-review mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:License-review@opensource.org">License-review@opensource.org</a><br>
<a href="http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-review" target="_blank">http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-review</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz<br><a href="mailto:pe.schmitz@googlemail.com">pe.schmitz@googlemail.com</a><br>tel. + 32 478 50 40 65
</div>