<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 27/02/2012 15:31, Simon Phipps wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAF4JVJD8aRdHyN6VyNMKBeeQo86ZWvAK0mN6q_hJVQ1L6-p=EA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<p><br>
On Feb 27, 2012 1:13 AM, "Lawrence Rosen" <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:lrosen@rosenlaw.com">lrosen@rosenlaw.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
> Now that we have driven our Creative Commons friends into
the closet,<br>
> can we please invite them back and approve their CC0
license even<br>
> though many of us don't really like it a lot? Then someone
document<br>
> this thread in an article for IFOSSLR so that the public at
large can learn<br>
> from this discussion.</p>
<p>My view exactly, Larry. While there have been interesting
points raised, I still see a majority view supporting CC0 as a
(flawed) OSD-compliant licensing arrangement.</p>
<p>S.</p>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Indeed if someone could distill the discussion, I am all in favor of
having it documented in IFOSSLR (speaking as a member of the
Editorial Committee of it). I found the discussion very interesting,
although I have not had time to read each and any messages. The
reference to the MXM license I submitted for approval some months
ago did not escape me, though. ;-)<br>
<br>
With best regards,<br>
<br>
Carlo<br>
</body>
</html>