[License-review] Subject: Re: License Approval: FARCL-1.0

[McCoy Smith]

On 2/13/2026 10:07 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>
> Also, folks: don't we already have a very simple license that 
> nevertheless requires redistribution of source code already?  I feel 
> like there must be something that Bauti can adopt that's already 
> approved.
>
Well, all the copyleft ones.

Which, more than half of the "Popular/Strong Community" licenses are: 
https://opensource.org/licenses?categories=popular-strong-community

[I'm not sure what "very simple" means in this context but if you're 
going to make a license copyleft you tend to have to put more language 
in then a non-copyleft license]