[License-review] Notice requirement for model output: OSD-compliant or not? (ModelGo)

[Pamela Chestek]

On 3/3/2025 3:03 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 3:28 AM Moming Duan <duanmoming at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>     I am also considering whether we could narrow this clause so that
>     it only applies when distributing a collection of outputs,
>     requiring disclosure of the info of original model and its
>     license. Any suggestions on this? Thanks.
>
>
> That sounds like a restriction or condition on mere use. That would 
> not be open source.
>
> Simon
> (in a personal capacity)
>
He's analogizing it to an attribution requirement.

Pam

Pamela S. Chestek
Chestek Legal
PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW MAILING ADDRESS
4641 Post St.
Unit 4316
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
+1 919-800-8033
pamela at chesteklegal.com
www.chesteklegal.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20250303/75c88614/attachment.htm>