[License-review] New License for review: ADVPL 1.0

[Krzysztof Siewicz]

On 11.09.2024 09:28, Carlo Piana wrote:
>
> ----- Messaggio originale -----
>> Da: "Josh Berkus" <josh at berkus.org>
>> A: "License submissions for OSI review" <license-review at lists.opensource.org>, "Eric Schultz" <eric at wwahammy.com>, "Ω
>> Alisson" <thelinuxlich at gmail.com>
>> Inviato: Martedì, 10 settembre 2024 2:11:25
>> Oggetto: Re: [License-review] New License for review: ADVPL 1.0
>> On 9/5/24 09:50, Eric Schultz wrote:
>>> Some people on this list have expressed that some non-operative
>>> preambles could preclude a license from being OSD compliant. I don't
>>> think I agree with that conclusion but you should be aware of that.
>> Seems unlikely?  That might require us to rule the GPL as non-compliant,
>> and I'm for sure not going there.
> Indeed the GPL is a good example. But in general, I don't see how a non-operative preamble,  which by

Hello,

Would anyone have a moment to point which parts of the GPL preamble 
cause the controversies with the OSD? Or maybe at least point our where 
in the archives to look for these discussions?

Many thanks in advance!

KS

-- 
Krzysztof Siewicz | Licensing and Compliance Manager, Free Software Foundation
GPG Key: 6DC9 E663 36DB 9588 81AB 7E43 2671 24EF FC9C D84E
https://fsf.org

We urgently need your financial support: http://www.fsf.org/join

Give the gift of an FSF associate membership:
https://my.fsf.org/gift-a-membership

Follow the FSF on Mastodon: https://hostux.social/@fsf

Sign up for the FSF's newsletter: https://www.fsf.org/fss

US government employee? Use CFC charity code 63210 to support us through
the Combined Federal Campaign. https://cfcgiving.opm.gov/