[License-review] Los Alamos National Labs BSD-3 Variant License Approval

[Pettinger, Adam L]

Good afternoon,

Do you have an idea of when this approval might happen? It is blocking the PR to release the package we want to.

Thanks!
Adam
________________________________
From: License-review <license-review-bounces at lists.opensource.org> on behalf of Pettinger, Adam L via License-review <license-review at lists.opensource.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 8:47 AM
To: License submissions for OSI review <license-review at lists.opensource.org>; Carlo Piana <carlo at piana.eu>
Cc: Pettinger, Adam L <adam.pettinger at tamu.edu>
Subject: Re: [License-review] Los Alamos National Labs BSD-3 Variant License Approval

Awesome! Please let me know if I need to take further action here Best, Adam From: License-review <license-review-bounces@ lists. opensource. org> on behalf of Josh Berkus <josh@ berkus. org> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2024 11: 36 AM To: 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Awesome! Please let me know if I need to take further action here

Best,
Adam
________________________________
From: License-review <license-review-bounces at lists.opensource.org> on behalf of Josh Berkus <josh at berkus.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2024 11:36 AM
To: License submissions for OSI review <license-review at lists.opensource.org>; Carlo Piana <carlo at piana.eu>
Subject: Re: [License-review] Los Alamos National Labs BSD-3 Variant License Approval

On 6/27/24 05: 25, Carlo Piana wrote: > The only concern is that there are probably a ton of these very specific > licenses out there, of which collectively we (surely I) are totally > unaware, that may resurface. Just flagging the
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

On 6/27/24 05:25, Carlo Piana wrote:
> The only concern is that there are probably a ton of these very specific
>   licenses out there, of which collectively we (surely I) are totally
> unaware, that may resurface. Just flagging the issue in case there is a
> surge in the applications.

That's a listing/categorization problem, though, and solvable with a
little web design.  It would be nice to have non-reusable licenses in
their own place; users need to know they're OSS, but developers should
know not to use them.

--
Josh Berkus


_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Communication from the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-review mailing list
License-review at lists.opensource.org
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org__;!!KwNVnqRv!BBo2BDtmDxmWw0JD-WP8hMusOfHDr0ux_bttCnFodEDkAiPttcQDYCdR3xPm7Rx11-NCD6DCbucJgAH95A$

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20240724/2ef2778f/attachment-0001.htm>