[License-review] For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.3 (was v1.2)

[Andreas Nettsträter]

>   So, you are refusing to provide a justification for why this license is needed?

We're not refusing a justification, and already provided one, but don't see the need to provide a FAQ as part of the approval process. 

 “This new license is intended to represent the rights and obligations of an established license, such as Apache v2, while respecting the differences between US and German law.“

As stated several times before, it is important for our partners to develop and publish open source, based on a license using formulations as unambiguous and explicit as possible with regards to German law.

Regards
Andreas


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Josh Berkus <josh at berkus.org> 
Gesendet: Montag, 23. Januar 2023 18:00
An: License submissions for OSI review <license-review at lists.opensource.org>; Andreas Nettsträter <andreas.nettstraeter at openlogisticsfoundation.org>
Betreff: Re: [License-review] For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.3 (was v1.2)

On 1/23/23 03:39, Andreas Nettsträter wrote:
>   Therefore, we don't see the necessity to provide a FAQ (which is a living document and therefore cannot be approved) in order to answer the question if the license meets the open source definition, even if this results in a "no" vote.

So, you are refusing to provide a justification for why this license is needed?

--
Josh Berkus