[License-review] For Legacy Approval: Zope Public License v2.1

[Kevin P. Fleming]

Is there a reason Zope 2.1 should be listed as 'legacy' and not as a
'non-reusable' license as Zope 2.0 is currently listed? It's still in
active use, so it doesn't seem like it should be listed as 'legacy'.

On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 9:27 PM Josh Berkus <josh at berkus.org> wrote:
>
> On 4/6/21 5:52 PM, McCoy Smith wrote:
> > Shouldn't ZPL2.0 also be listed as superseded if this latest version is a replacement for it?
>
> Presumably, yes.
>
> +1 to do that, and +1 to approve Zope 2.1
>
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
>
> _______________________________________________
> The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Communication from the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
>
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at lists.opensource.org
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org