[License-review] Fwd: For Approval | Open Source Social Network License 1.0

[Syed Arsalan Hussain Shah]

Thank you Russell,  as we going to use cryptographic autonomy license 1.0
(as we decided till now),  I am unable to find an actual license file on
your website. Can you point me in a direction where I can download it?

As we are open source , we don't want someone to criticize us about our
license, open source work, and the efforts  we have done so we prefer to
use OSI approved license mentioned above. If in the future we have enough
budget for open source project, we shall hire attorney and draft license
for approval but till then we'll use the above license. (because AAL and
CPAL are likely to be removed)

Thanks again for clarification about `open source` word and its use case,

On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 12:14 AM Russell Nelson <nelson at crynwr.com> wrote:

> On 3/28/20 12:41 PM, Lukas Atkinson wrote:
> > You won't be sued for using a license that wasn't OSI-approved. A
> > license can also  be Open Source without this stamp of approval.
>
> That's a bold statement, and one that the OSI does not stand behind.
> Please see the email I sent ten minutes ago to this list.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not
> necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Communication from the
> Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
>
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at lists.opensource.org
>
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20200329/7c7b9274/attachment.html>