[License-review] veto against Unlicense

[Josh Berkus]

On 6/1/20 4:39 PM, Langley, Stuart wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Huh.  It honestly hadn't occured to me to see it that way.  From a
>> developer perspective the unlicense is pretty clear.  If I was to fault
>> it on something, it's the fact that there's no requirement to include
>> the license on redistribution, making me wonder how effective the
>> warranty disclaimer is.
> [STL] I think your perspective is important.  What developers intend when they use the license is important. 
> 
> 

The developer side of this list was always OK with the unlicense, I
think.  It got blocked because the attorneys said it wouldn't fly with
international law.

-- 
Josh Berkus