[License-review] veto against Unlicense
josh at berkus.org
Tue Jun 2 16:51:45 UTC 2020
On 6/1/20 4:39 PM, Langley, Stuart wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Huh. It honestly hadn't occured to me to see it that way. From a
>> developer perspective the unlicense is pretty clear. If I was to fault
>> it on something, it's the fact that there's no requirement to include
>> the license on redistribution, making me wonder how effective the
>> warranty disclaimer is.
> [STL] I think your perspective is important. What developers intend when they use the license is important.
The developer side of this list was always OK with the unlicense, I
think. It got blocked because the attorneys said it wouldn't fly with
More information about the License-review