[License-review] mailing list bashing again (was Re: For Approval – CERN Open Hardware Licence Version 2– Strongly Reciprocal (SPDX: CERN-OHL-S-2.0); CERN Open Hardware Licence Version 2– Weakly Reciprocal (SPDX: CERN-OHL-W-2.0); CERN Open Hardware Licence Version 2– Permissive (SPDX:)

[Thorsten Glaser]

Lawrence Rosen dixit:

>Pam, you and OSI can continue to push this OSI list as the official
>license discussion forum. But as long as you refuse to consider using
>Discourse as your discussion mechanism, you will continue to meet
>resistance. OSI needs to grow up and use mature tools! I've been here
>since the late 1990s and remain distressed by your resistance to change

Nice tantrum, congratulations.

>since that time! You are simply old fashioned!/Larry

Ooh, name calling as well! Splendid!

1167 lines of text-above-fullquote-below stripped. For someone who
“[has] been here since the late 1990s” you utterly fail at using an
MUA properly.

No comment, these facts can stand for themselves.

</unlurk>,
//mirabilos
-- 
> Wish I had pine to hand :-( I'll give lynx a try, thanks.

Michael Schmitz on nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k
a.k.a. {news.gmane.org/nntp}#news.gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k in pine