[License-review] Approval: OIN License (Open Innovation License)

[Pamela Chestek]

The TSDR is the permanent link.

https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=78750758&caseSearchType=US_APPLICATION&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch

Pam

Pamela S. Chestek
Chestek Legal
PO Box 2492
Raleigh, NC 27602
919-800-8033
pamela at chesteklegal.com
www.chesteklegal.com

On 12/27/2020 9:09 AM, McCoy Smith wrote:
> *Registration Number* 	3442502
> *Registration Date* 	June 3, 2008
> *Owner* 	(LAST LISTED OWNER) OPEN INVENTION NETWORK, LLC LIMITED 
> LIABILITY COMPANY DELAWARE RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK CENTER 4819 EMPEROR 
> BOULEVARD, SUITE 400 DURHAM NORTH CAROLINA 27703
>
>
> Mark: “OIN”
>
> For
>
> IC 042. US 100 101. G & S: *Licensing of intellectual property;* 
> providing information via an internet website in the fields of 
> information technology, new technology innovation and research. FIRST 
> USE: 20080207. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20080207
>
> (Emphasis added by me)
>
>> On Dec 27, 2020, at 7:01 AM, Simon Phipps <simon at webmink.com> wrote:
>>
>> 
>> I clicked the search and it told me it had expired without telling me 
>> the search terms. You want to supply more detail!
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 1:49 PM McCoy Smith <mccoy at lexpan.law> wrote:
>>
>>     http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4801:8jjlgg.2.3
>>     <http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4801:8jjlgg.2.3>
>>
>>     You might want to talk to your lawyer about the second, live,
>>     registration, before you go further down that road.
>>
>>>     On Dec 27, 2020, at 12:35 AM, Andrew Nassief
>>>     <kamalandrew55 at gmail.com <mailto:kamalandrew55 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     
>>>
>>>         The term open innovation been used since the 1960s:
>>>
>>>         https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_innovation
>>>         <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_innovation>
>>>
>>>         A substantially higher amount of people are familiar with
>>>         the term open innovation then they are with the open
>>>         innovation network. Saying that the Open Innovation Network
>>>         now own the entire OIN acronym is unfair because as I made
>>>         the point earlier, many acronyms are used can be implied for
>>>         other things. Also, if Open Innovation should only be
>>>         synonymous with the Open Innovation Network that would be
>>>         very restrictive. You can't trademark open Innovation ad
>>>         they are two genetic words, and since the OIN identifier
>>>         isn't used on other open source licenses, saying it is
>>>         unusable on behalf of an entity is in itself a restrictive
>>>         principal.
>>>
>>>
>>>         Anyways, in regards to your other inquiries, I will submit a
>>>         license by license analysis and respond to your inquiries
>>>         individually as soon as I can.
>>>
>>>
>>>         Best regards, Andrew
>>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and
>>     not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative.
>>     Communication from the Open Source Initiative will be sent from
>>     an opensource.org <http://opensource.org> email address.
>>
>>     License-review mailing list
>>     License-review at lists.opensource.org
>>     <mailto:License-review at lists.opensource.org>
>>     http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org
>>     <http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> *Simon Phipps*
>> /Office:/+1 (415) 683-7660 /or/ +44 (238) 098 7027
>> /Signal/Mobile/:  +44 774 776 2816/
>> /
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Communication from the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
>
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at lists.opensource.org
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20201228/59fc3c57/attachment-0001.html>