[License-review] Approval: OIN License (Open Innovation License)

[Andrew Nassief]

>
> Hi I'm not dismissing concerns about morally enforcing. The claim isn't
> legally binding. You are arguing about it being morally binding. The
> mission statement I have emphasizes personal responsibility. There is no
> central authority claiming thought or how one adheres to the mission
> statement. If one disagrees with the statement, the use a different open
> source license. Nobody is enforced to do anything. This isn't far off as
> being upset with codes of conduct that says at good faith or followed in
> spirit. What about stuff like CAL-1.0 that specifically state "for private
> purposes" in a list. Emphasis on the word "for". Again, people aren't
> enforced to use this license and their extent or responsibility is their
> extent.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20201227/69ce1b4e/attachment.html>