[License-review] [License-discuss] Certifying MIT-0

[Pamela Chestek]

Moving discussion to license-review, since the Unlicense is under review.

Pam

On 4/24/2020 10:45 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> Ignoring the legal morass of complexity that is the Public Domain, do
> you honestly think there is any practical risk from honoring an
> extreme permissive license where the copyright holder effectively says
> "I disclaim this and invite you to do whatever you want with it". I
> could see a possible concern in a lack of warranty disclaimer, but you
> should be able to add it if you were concerned.
>
> I just don't see the copyright holder having any ground to stand on if
> they were to take you to court after having attempted to abandon their
> copyright.
>
> Obviously, IANAL, so I am genuinely interested in what others think.
>
> Tom
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020, 10:39 AM Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd.de
> <mailto:tg at mirbsd.de>> wrote:
>
>     Ryan Birmingham dixit:
>
>     >reasons that the unlicense is not.
>
>     “Unlicense” is a PD dedication, not a licence, and therefore
>     not portable to at least a good part of the EU, unusable both
>     for consumers and creators. I have to treat stuff under the
>     “Unlicense” as proprietary unlicenced unusable crap.
>
>     (Sadly, it’s also still listed on the Copyfree site… perhaps
>     I have to start my own curated list… ☹)
>
>     bye,
>     //mirabilos
>     -- 
>     I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit
>     upon it
>     when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely
>     copy them.
>     If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you
>     won't deny
>     existence.              -- Coywolf Qi Hunt
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and
>     not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official
>     statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an
>     opensource.org <http://opensource.org> email address.
>
>     License-discuss mailing list
>     License-discuss at lists.opensource.org
>     <mailto:License-discuss at lists.opensource.org>
>     http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
>
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at lists.opensource.org
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20200424/4416d599/attachment.html>