[License-review] For Legacy Approval: LBNL BSD (Sebastian Ainslie)

[Smith, McCoy]

>>From: License-review [mailto:license-review-bounces at lists.opensource.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Ainslie
>>Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 2:57 PM
>>To: license-review at lists.opensource.org
>>Subject: Re: [License-review] For Legacy Approval: LBNL BSD (Sebastian Ainslie)

>>Note that as we are Dept of Energy (DOE) funded we cannot use the verbatim BSD as DOE requires us to make certain slight modifications therein anyway.

Other than the addition of the name LBNL in the copyright statement and the non-endorsement clause, and the tacked on default contribution license, this looks identical to BSD.  Which of those parts are required by DOE funding?
Note that the OSI-approved modified 3-clause BSD does not specify any particular copyright holder or non-endorsee:  https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause