[License-review] For Legacy Approval: LBNL BSD
Pamela Chestek
pamela at chesteklegal.com
Wed May 22 12:38:50 UTC 2019
Sebastian,
Perhaps you missed my question below?
Thanks,
Pam
Pamela S. Chestek
Chestek Legal
PO Box 2492
Raleigh, NC 27602
+1 919-800-8033
pamela at chesteklegal.com
www.chesteklegal.com
On 5/17/19 11:42 PM, Pamela Chestek wrote:
> On 5/17/19 11:29 AM, Sebastian Ainslie wrote:
>> The reason for the added paragraph is the ability to accept contributions automatically without having to do a written and signed CLA for each one separately IF licensee wants to contribute back to the Lab. Tracking each contribution would be unmanageable across the Lab as we have so many projects on the go and neither the people nor resources to manage this licensing aspect.
> I'm not following this reasoning. The language accomplishes that whether
> or not it is approved as an open source license.
>
> Pam
>
>
> Pamela S. Chestek
> Chestek Legal
> PO Box 2492
> Raleigh, NC 27602
> +1 919-800-8033
> pamela at chesteklegal.com
> www.chesteklegal.com
More information about the License-review
mailing list