[License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4)

[Pamela Chestek]

On 12/26/2019 6:04 PM, VanL wrote:
> There is no conflict with privacy laws - in fact, the CAL was written
> so that compliance with the strongest extant privacy laws would also
> satisfy the user data requirements of the CAL - and also, so that it
> did not require giving any information that would be prohibited by
> current privacy laws.
>
Can you elaborate on where in the license this potential conflict is
addressed?

Pam


Pamela S. Chestek
Chestek Legal
PO Box 2492
Raleigh, NC 27602
919-800-8033
pamela at chesteklegal.com
www.chesteklegal.com