[License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4)

[Bruce Perens]

On Fri, Dec 6, 2019, 6:19 PM VanL <van.lindberg at gmail.com> wrote:

> You are arguing about imagined future business conduct.
>

It's valid to argue about questions like "what is the intent of the terms",
"what are the implications of the terms in practice", "how would
unfortunate outcomes of the terms play out".
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20191206/681cf4db/attachment.html>