[License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2)

[VanL]

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019, 12:30 PM Bruce Perens via License-review <
license-review at lists.opensource.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:25 AM Josh Berkus <josh at berkus.org> wrote:
>
>> I don't recall anyone making that argument in this discussion.  Who did?
>
>
> Van wrote this yesterday, and I considered it an iteration of the
> "irrelevance" argument:
> > I am a supporter of the OSI. I think the OSI is important, and that it
> serves an important function. But I can also see that some people are
> already choosing to bypass the OSI for various reasons.
>

The context here was Bradley's suggestion that a several-years-long testing
period was the appropriate course of action before the OSI made any
decision.

Thanks,
Van
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20190829/d0dec0d7/attachment.html>