[License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2)

[Pamela Chestek]

On 8/23/2019 2:31 PM, VanL wrote:
> Bruce's - and your - arguments are frequently addressed to what I
> might term "data in the large." Bruce made this point explicitly, by
> invoking the slippery slope argument. However, should we be looking
> more specifically at the CAL's requirements? They were written to be
> narrow and closely tied to the actual capability to use the software.
Can you walk me through how that's the case? That is the piece I'm missing.

Pam

Pamela S. Chestek
Chestek Legal
PO Box 2492
Raleigh, NC 27602
919-800-8033
pamela at chesteklegal.com
www.chesteklegal.com