[License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2)

[Pamela Chestek]

On 8/22/19 7:20 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> I on the other hand disagree with characterising what Van has clearly
> framed as a requirement arising from use of the software with the
> generic term "data restriction".  As others have pointed out, the
> requirement arises from the licensing of the software and does not
> mutate into a restriction or requirement uniquely associated with the
> data.
>  
Disclaimer: Personal view.

I don't follow your distinction. All objectionable impairments can be
framed as conditions on the license. "This license is granted on the
condition that you water my plants on Thursday." So plant-watering is
properly the subject matter of an open source license?

Pam

Pamela S. Chestek
Chestek Legal
PO Box 2492
Raleigh, NC 27602
+1 919-800-8033
pamela at chesteklegal.com
www.chesteklegal.com