[License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2)

[Simon Phipps]

On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:58 PM Pamela Chestek <pamela at chesteklegal.com>
wrote:

>
> For what it's worth, I agree with Bruce's view on the inappropriateness of
> imposing restrictions on data in a software license. So he is not the only
> one.
>

I on the other hand disagree with characterising what Van has clearly
framed as a requirement arising from use of the software with the generic
term "data restriction".  As others have pointed out, the requirement
arises from the licensing of the software and does not mutate into a
restriction or requirement uniquely associated with the data.


>
> And I hope it's obvious that am speaking here for myself only, not for the
> OSI.
>

Likewise, hence use of my personal e-mail. I've an OSI comment to make so
will send that seperately.

S.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20190823/7ff1ecef/attachment.html>