[License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2)

[Josh Berkus]

On 8/22/19 3:29 PM, Bruce Perens wrote:
> This is a contractually-required performance requirement which attempts
> to synthesize a data right which does not actually exist in the local
> jurisdiction. And thus it is the same as every approach to OSI with a
> license that attempts to enforce something that might properly be a law,
> but isn't, so we'll try to make it a license term instead.

I have no opinion on whether something is legally enforceable; I leave
that to the lawyers.

On 8/22/19 3:29 PM, Bruce Perens wrote:> Actually, I am declining to say
that one party is more important than
> the other. I can't see that I have much of a right to say one
> law-abiding person is more important than another.

Your invokation of OSD#6 on this was *definitely* a statement that one
party's rights are more important than another's.

-- 
Josh Berkus