[License-review] For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License

[Bruce Perens]

Let's try that again.

Van's response was a reply to this question:

>* First, would you please discuss whether there is a sufficient public
*>* performance right for software defined in 17 USC 106 (4), (5) and (6)? I
*>* read your discussion of Public Performance and was not enlightened.*
*

Upon re-reading, it appears that Van read my question as asking whether
software was copyrightable at all, and did not really answer the question
about the public performance right. This is either misunderstanding, or
squirrely lawyer stuff :-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20190430/2a090aaa/attachment.html>