[License-review] For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License

[Smith, McCoy]

>>From: License-review [mailto:license-review-bounces at lists.opensource.org] On Behalf Of Richard Fontana
>>Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 8:09 AM
>>To: License submissions for OSI review <license-review at lists.opensource.org>
>>Subject: Re: [License-review] For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License

>>I'm not sure if my reading is correct there, but I believe my confusion is based on the ambiguous definition of Modified Work:

>>“Modified Work” means any work containing, directly combining with, derivative of, or Publicly Performing an interface included in or derived from the Work.

>>I think you mean "any work containing, directly combining with, derivative of, or {Publicly Performing an interface included in or derived from} the Work

>>and not

>>"any work {containing, directly combining with, derivative of, or Publicly Performing} an interface included in or derived from the Work

>>

Might be a good opportunity to avail yourself (or not, depending on your intent) of the Oxford comma:  https://thewritelife.com/is-the-oxford-comma-necessary/