[License-review] OSD #9 would not make SSPL OSD-incompliant

[Lawrence Rosen]

> None of your arguments are making any sense here.  Wanna try again?

OK, that sometimes happens to people at my age! Thanks for the warning....

None of the FSF statements you cited about "mere use" being an exception to the GPL copyleft requirements include a definition of "mere use"? That leaves us all legally perplexed as to "agency," "subcontracting" or "scope of control." 

And you should define "license Ragnarök."

/Larry