[License-review] OSD #9 would not make SSPL OSD-incompliant

[Kyle Mitchell]

On 2018-10-23 12:10, Bruce Perens wrote:
> The title of each definition is a summary necessarily limited by its
> length. The definition is the meat, and unfortunately I did not write it in
> a way that would apply to software that is not distributed.
>
> I'm very sorry.

Don't apologize!  Take credit.

I notice that somewhere between DFSG and OSD, the heading
was slightly changed:

DFSG: License Must Not Contaminate Other Software

OSD:  License Must Not Restrict    Other Software

I'd call that an improvement.  Granted, not one that answers
all today's questions.  One step at a time.

-- 
Kyle Mitchell, attorney // Oakland // (510) 712 - 0933