[License-review] OSD #9 would not make SSPL OSD-incompliant
kyle at kemitchell.com
Tue Oct 23 23:15:13 UTC 2018
On 2018-10-23 12:10, Bruce Perens wrote:
> The title of each definition is a summary necessarily limited by its
> length. The definition is the meat, and unfortunately I did not write it in
> a way that would apply to software that is not distributed.
> I'm very sorry.
Don't apologize! Take credit.
I notice that somewhere between DFSG and OSD, the heading
was slightly changed:
DFSG: License Must Not Contaminate Other Software
OSD: License Must Not Restrict Other Software
I'd call that an improvement. Granted, not one that answers
all today's questions. One step at a time.
Kyle Mitchell, attorney // Oakland // (510) 712 - 0933
More information about the License-review