[License-review] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0 and Government licensing [was: moving to an issue tracker [was Re: Some notes for license submitters]]

[Tzeng, Nigel H.]

Neither Cem or I is NASA but my impression is that NASA is eager to move to 2.0 is approved.

I dunno what “retire” officially means but there are NOSA 1.3 code bases outside of NASA’s control but those are forked from NASA open source releases.  Those would move to 2.0 at their own discretion.

I don’t think anybody but NASA creates brand new NOSA projects so I would expect new releases would occur under 2.0.


Sent with BlackBerry Work
(www.blackberry.com)

From: Simon Phipps <simon at webmink.com<mailto:simon at webmink.com>>
Date: Wednesday, Jun 20, 2018, 4:49 PM
To: License submissions for OSI review <license-review at lists.opensource.org<mailto:license-review at lists.opensource.org>>
Subject: Re: [License-review] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0 and Government licensing [was: moving to an issue tracker [was Re: Some notes for license submitters]]



On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:44 PM, Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) <cem.f.karan.civ at mail.mil<mailto:cem.f.karan.civ at mail.mil>> wrote:

Are you worried that NOSA 1.3 and 2.0 will be active at the same time?

Remind me, are you proposing to retuire NOSA 1.3 on approval of NOSA 2.0?

S.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20180620/d98cfda0/attachment-0001.html>