[License-review] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0 and Government licensing [was: moving to an issue tracker [was Re: Some notes for license submitters]]

[Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh berkus [mailto:josh at postgresql.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 1:02 PM
> To: License submissions for OSI review <license-review at lists.opensource.org>; Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
> <cem.f.karan.civ at mail.mil>
> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [License-review] NOSA 2.0 and Government licensing [was: moving to an issue tracker [was Re: Some
> notes for license submitters]]
> 
> On 06/20/2018 06:07 AM, Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) wrote:
> > Given all this, yes, there ARE additional reasons for approving new licenses beyond what you've listed above.  Help the community
> solve these problems so that more people can fit in the Open Source tent.
> 
> Do note that Bruce's opinion on proliferation is just Bruce's opinion.  Influential, but not determinative.
> 
> --Josh Berkus

I understand, but I also know that NOSA 2.0 has been in review for what, 5 years now?  The NASA guys are tearing their hair out in frustration over this...


Thanks,
Cem Karan

---
Other than quoted laws, regulations or officially published policies, the views expressed herein are not intended to be used as an authoritative state of the law nor do they reflect official positions of the U.S. Army, Department of Defense or U.S. Government.