[License-review] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0 and Government licensing [was: moving to an issue tracker [was Re: Some notes for license submitters]]

[Bruce Perens]

>
> This is generally handled with a contributor license agreement. I am not
> seeing that the license as stated protects you or anyone else from this
> particular issue. If it does, please point out the text.
>

No, I'm wrong about this point, the text is there. However, a contributor
license agreement is better, because it has consent.

    Thanks

    Bruce
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20180620/ed612e5a/attachment.html>