[License-review] moving to an issue tracker [was Re: Some notes for license submitters]

[Nigel T]

If you want to be a purist then run gitlab-ce on an OSI server as I recall that gitlab-ee was closed (look but don’t touch).

I wouldn’t be overly surprised if Microsoft released a github-ce at some point.  OSI could ask Microsoft to do so in exchange having a presence there.

I like that the VS Code source was released under MIT. That the binary isn’t open doesn’t bother me any more than the relationship between Chrome/Chromium.  .NET Core is also MIT licensed.  Too bad they haven’t released an open source UI layer.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 19, 2018, at 2:39 PM, Bruce Perens <bruce at perens.com> wrote:
> 
> My preference would be for OSI to use open source tools. It's a credibility thing. We talk the talk, we should walk the walk. For some reason OSI internal business is using G Suite, and someone's using GitHub? As far as I'm aware, these things aren't entirely open source.
> _______________________________________________
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at lists.opensource.org
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org