[License-review] resolving ambiguities in OSD [was Re: For Approval: License Zero Reciprocal Public License]

[Josh berkus]

On 10/24/2017 05:36 PM, Kyle Mitchell wrote:
>> It's not actually unwritten. You can find volumes about it on this list.
>> Just not codified.
> For what it's worth, as someone undergoing this process in
> the first person for the first time, I can't overstate how
> helpful it is to have static webpages setting out the
> Definition, the annotations, and the review process.

For that matter, as a member of this committee, if there are criteria
other than the below for evaluating licenses, I would like to know about
them:

1. Is legally valid/rigorous

2. Complies with OSD

3. Is significantly different from existing licenses

4. Has a substantiated use case

Those are all of the criteria that I'm aware of.  So if there are others
I should be examining, please let me know.