[License-review] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0?

[Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)]

No problem, it's just that it's starting to become a really important issue 
due to code.gov, so if you can give me something that I can pass along, I'd 
appreciate it.

Thanks,
Cem Karan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: License-review [mailto:license-review-bounces at opensource.org] On 
> Behalf Of Richard Fontana
> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 12:04 PM
> To: License submissions for OSI review <license-review at opensource.org>
> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [License-review] NOSA 2.0?
>
> All active links contained in this email were disabled.  Please verify the 
> identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links
> contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a 
> Web browser.
>
>
>
>
> ----
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 07:46:57PM +0000, Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL 
> (US) wrote:
> > What is the current progress on the NOSA 2.0 license?  I just got out
> > of a meeting with some NASA lawyers, and they want to know where it's
> > going, and if it's stuck, why it's stuck.
>
> I still need to write up my concerns about the license, sorry.
>
> _______________________________________________
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at opensource.org
> Caution-https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-review
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6419 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20170728/746696c4/attachment.p7s>