[License-review] on OSI review/rejection [was Re: NOSA 2.0 - 'Up or Down' vote]]

John Cowan cowan at ccil.org
Mon Jan 9 22:33:00 UTC 2017

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Luis Villa <luis at lu.is> wrote:

I think rejection is perfectly appropriate for licenses that obviously
> violate the OSD or other *clear, written, (ideally) objective* OSI
> policies.

Strictly speaking, AFAIK, the OSI never *rejects* anything.  It simply
declines to approve it.  The submitter is always free to revise and

John Cowan          http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan        cowan at ccil.org
Gules six bars argent on a canton azure 50 mullets argent
six five six five six five six five and six
   --blazoning the U.S. flag <http://web.meson.org/blazonserver>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20170109/baadecc7/attachment.html>

More information about the License-review mailing list