[License-review] New license approvals

[Henri Yandell]

+1. Looking forward to reading them when posted as it wasn't clear from
this list which license specifically the BSD+Patents is.

Unless I'm missing them, they haven't been posted yet.

Hen

On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Henrik Ingo <henrik.ingo at avoinelama.fi>
wrote:

> If the person who will publish these on the website could give a heads
> up on this list when that task is completed, that would be much
> appreaciated!
>
> henrik
>
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Richard Fontana <fontana at opensource.org>
> wrote:
> > Good news, everyone!
> >
> > The OSI has approved both the Upstream Compatibility License 1.0 and the
> > BSD+Patent License.
> >
> > The UCL was specifically approved as a 'Special Purpose' proliferation
> > category license. I see that McCoy Smith suggested the same category for
> > BSD+Patent but suggested as an alternative that it could be approved as
> > a variant to the 2-clause BSD license. The issue of proliferation
> > category was not specifically addressed in the course of approval of
> > BSD+Patent; for the moment I would assume it should be treated as
> > 'Special Purpose' as well.
> >
> > Richard
> > _______________________________________________
> > License-review mailing list
> > License-review at opensource.org
> > https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-review
>
>
>
> --
> henrik.ingo at avoinelama.fi
> +358-40-5697354        skype: henrik.ingo            irc: hingo
> www.openlife.cc
>
> My LinkedIn profile: http://fi.linkedin.com/pub/henrik-ingo/3/232/8a7
> _______________________________________________
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at opensource.org
> https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-review
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20170419/42b2c1c8/attachment.html>