[License-review] Submission of the Upstream Compatibility License v1.0 (UCL-1.0) for approval

[Josh berkus]

On 11/28/2016 05:01 PM, Richard Fontana wrote:
> I recognize one can argue that OSD 5 is intended to address different
> kinds of discriminatory treatment. Ultimately I think this should be
> decided by evolving community standards; it's not particularly an
> issue of legal judgment and so lawyers will be of limited usefulness. 

Can we get a ruling from the Board on license assymetry?  If we can have
a judgement on this, then it would make future discussions of similar
licenses easy.

--Josh Berkus