[License-review] Approval request for ZENTAO PUBLIC LICENSE
tcallawa at redhat.com
Thu Jun 23 18:06:33 UTC 2016
On 06/23/2016 02:02 PM, Josh berkus wrote:
> On 06/23/2016 10:42 AM, Smith, McCoy wrote:
>> Interesting. I'd forgotten about CPAL.
>> Just out of curiosity, was 4-clause BSD (aka BSD with advertising clause) ever on the OSI list? It seems that 3-clause came about (and 4-clause "rescinded") around the time that OSI was created. If 4-clause BSD were on the OSI list, that'd be another OSI-approved "badgeware" license (according to my understanding of that term).
>> But I'm suspecting it wasn't; I think there's never been a removal (just deprecation) of any license on the list, and the page on BSD doesn't show 3-clause as superseding 4-clause.
> IIRC, the 4-clause version was obsolesced by BSD before the OSI existed.
Since this is license-review, and pedantry is encouraged, the 4-clause
BSD license is only obsolete when the Copyright holder is the
Regents of the University of California. There are at least a few cases
where code is licensed under the "original" 4-clause BSD license, where
the copyright holder is not the Regents of the University of California,
and where the copyright holder has not dropped the advertising clause.
More information about the License-review