[License-review] Approval request for ZENTAO PUBLIC LICENSE

[Fei Teng]

As time goes by, everything is changing and changed. Different situation
requires different license. Changes might happen to badgeware license in
the future.

In China, a lot of developers who love open source eventually stopped
updating their software because of other developers' violation of the
common rules and disrespect the open source spirit.  If this keeps
happening, it is harmful to the whip open source community.

Is it to follow all the old rules which is detrimental to open source
spirit more important? Or to take actions to protect open source spirit
more important?




On Wednesday, June 22, 2016, Josh berkus <josh at postgresql.org
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','josh at postgresql.org');>> wrote:

> On 06/20/2016 08:29 PM, Fei Teng wrote:
> > 3. A lot of end users removed the badge of our product
> > 4. A lot of developers who develop based on our product removed the
> > badge of our product and they do NOT share their code with us
>
> I thought we weren't approving any badgeware licenses?  If that's the
> case, why are we still talking to Fei Teng?
>
> --Josh Berkus
> _______________________________________________
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at opensource.org
> https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-review
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20160623/8e522598/attachment.html>