[License-review] Approval request for ZENTAO PUBLIC LICENSE

[Fei Teng]

Yes, it works like badgeware, so it is needed if the software is modified.

On Thursday, June 16, 2016, Matthias Merkel <moritz30 at moritz30.de> wrote:

> "2.4 You or your company/organization must keep all the indications of the
> software when using it. None of the indications can be removed, hidden or
> obscured in any way."
> Sounds like badgeware. Is that also needed if the software is modified?
>
>
> ---- On Do, 16 Jun 2016 03:00:45 +0200 * crystaltoffee at hotmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','crystaltoffee at hotmail.com');> * wrote ----
>
> Dear License Review Board,
>
>
> I am writing to request the approval of ZENTAO PUBLIC LICENSE. The
> required information is as followed.
>
>       1. the *submission type* and *license name* in subject field (to
> ensure proper tracking) :
>
>    1.
>
>
>    ZENTAO PUBLIC LICENSE For Approval
>
>
>    2. a plaintext copy of the license （see attachment）
>
>
>    3. the supporting data listed below (as appropriate for the type of submission)
>
>
>
>
> *      -**Rationale:*
>
>        The new license clearly defines that indications of the software cannot be altered or removed in any way, so that it will make a balance in protecting the interests of the original author and maintaining business cooperation.
>
>       *-**Distinguish:*
>
>        ZENTAO PUBLIC LICENSE clarifies the specific indications of the software that should be changed or removed from the software, such as notes, texts, pictures and links showing copyright of the software.
>
> *       -**Proliferation category:*
>
>         Other/Miscellaneous licenses
>
>
>
>
>    1.
>
>    a link to earlier public discussions (if any)
>
>
>        http://zpl.pub/page/faq.html
>
>
> I am copying Richard as in Cc just in case that I can NOT post the request to the mailing list, which has happened before, and Richard has been helping me with this license review.
>
>
> Thank you all.
>
>
> Fei Teng
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at opensource.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','License-review at opensource.org');>
> https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-review
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20160616/650f0925/attachment.html>