[License-review] Octopus License

[dialog purpose]

Hello :)

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Josh berkus <josh at postgresql.org> wrote:

> On 12/22/2016 10:31 AM, dialog purpose wrote:
> > Hello, my name is Barzi Maghdid Ahmad, I have an open-source which I
> > want Open Source Initiative to approve it. It is based on Tcl/Tk
> > license, but I solved many problems to make it conform to the Open
> > Source Definition. I named it Octopus License. here is the license
> template:
>
> So, can you explain why this license is needed when we have both the MIT
> and two different BSD licenses?  The only substative difference I see is
> the requirement to add a copyright notice in each file, which is hard to
> regard as an improvement.
>
> Also, why "octopus"?
> _______________________________________________
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at opensource.org
> https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-review
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20161222/975c5c45/attachment.html>