[License-review] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Submission of the Upstream Compatibility License v1.0 (UCL-1.0) for approval

Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) cem.f.karan.civ at mail.mil
Mon Dec 5 13:36:33 UTC 2016


> -----Original Message-----
> From: License-review [mailto:license-review-bounces at opensource.org] On 
> Behalf Of Richard Fontana
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:59 PM
> To: License submissions for OSI review <license-review at opensource.org>
> Subject: Re: [License-review] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Submission of the 
> Upstream Compatibility License v1.0 (UCL-1.0) for approval
>
> All active links contained in this email were disabled.  Please verify the 
> identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links
> contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a 
> Web browser.
>
>
>
>
> ----
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 02:11:02PM +0000, Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL 
> (US) wrote:
>
> > > > Right now, ARL's Open Source License is stalled internally while
> > > > waiting for comments from higher ups; if NOSA 2.0 was
> > > > Apache-compatible and OSI approved, we could drop the ARL OSL and
> > > > go with NOSA 2.0 instead.
> > >
> > > What do you mean by 'Apache-compatible'?
> >
> > A license where code and other artifacts of a project that are
> > licensed under NOSA 2.0 could be legally imported into a project that
> > is licensed under Apache 2.0 (as defined at
> > Caution-http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0), and vice-versa.
> > We want our code to be useful to the Open Source community; having a
> > license that is OSI approved, but incompatible with other licenses is, in 
> > my not so humble opinion, a bad idea.
>
> I think it's safe to say that NOSA 2.0 is not Apache-compatible in this 
> sense.

I see.  In that case, I'll keep hammering on our internal people to get 
answers from them.  Depending on what answers I get, I may have to start 
pushing OSI approval for the ARL OSL.

Thanks,
Cem Karan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5559 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20161205/591ae3c1/attachment.p7s>


More information about the License-review mailing list