[License-review] Outstanding license submissions

[Engel Nyst]

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Bryan Geurts <superbag22 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 4.    We are wondering about the standard of review for the approval process.  Of course, the basic standard is the Open Source Definition, which we have scrupulously adhered to in crafting NOSA 2.0.  (I note here that the very few comments that were made based upon the OSD standard were made early in this two year process and were successfully addressed.)

In an old message [1] you indicate that you were going to update NOSA
2.0 and submit the update, however I don't find any updated version.
The version forwarded in 2015 [2] seems the same with the initial
submission, it still contains the text "by any other contributor" and
"any other recipient participation".

Am I missing the version where those concerns were addressed?


[1] https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2014-December/002296.html
[2] https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2015-February/002304.html

-- 
~ "We like to think of our forums as a Free-Speech Zone. And freedom
works best at the point of a bayonet." (Amazon, Inc.)