[License-review] [Was: Submission of OSET Public License for Approval] -- National Security and Public Policy (3.5B and 4)

[Josh Berkus]

On 09/17/2015 01:11 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> 
> If this is the case the clauses in question aren't needed so could be
> dropped. We would surely be foolish to set the precedent that building
> inequality into a license is acceptable?

Precisely.  If governments already have immunity, the clause is not
needed; if they don't, then the clause is bad.  Either way, it is not
something OSI should be endorsing.

--Josh Berkus