[License-review] Submission of OSET Public License for Approval
Meeker, Heather J.
hmeeker at omm.com
Thu Sep 3 14:30:20 UTC 2015
Thanks, Richard. Yes, I think that is the best choice.
Sent from my tablet --Heather Meeker
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 8:27 PM, Richard Fontana <fontana at sharpeleven.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 10:18:59PM +0000, Meeker, Heather J. wrote:
>> Thank you for your consideration and we look forward to the discussion!
> Thanks Heather.
> I don't think we've been consistently enforcing the 'recommend a
> proliferation category' requirement at the outset, but would you agree
> this license ought to be classified as 'special purpose'? (See:
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at opensource.org
More information about the License-review