[License-review] Submission of OSET Public License for Approval

[Meeker, Heather J.]

Thanks, Richard.  Yes, I think that is the best choice.

Sent from my tablet --Heather Meeker

> On Sep 2, 2015, at 8:27 PM, Richard Fontana <fontana at sharpeleven.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 10:18:59PM +0000, Meeker, Heather J. wrote:
>> 
>> Thank you for your consideration and we look forward to the discussion!
> 
> Thanks Heather.
> 
> I don't think we've been consistently enforcing the 'recommend a
> proliferation category' requirement at the outset, but would you agree
> this license ought to be classified as 'special purpose'? (See:
> http://opensource.org/proliferation-report)
> 
> Richard
> 
> _______________________________________________
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at opensource.org
> https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-review