[License-review] For Legacy Approval: TOPPERS License

[Yutaka MATSUBARA]

Hello Simon,

On 6/16/15 06:07, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Yutaka MATSUBARA <yutaka at ertl.jp
> <mailto:yutaka at ertl.jp>> wrote:
>
>
>         There is a reasonable amount of historical precedent that
>         mandatory
>         notification requirements make a license not open source.
>
>         However, as noted in this thread, this question is moot
>         because people
>         can just do a) instead.
>
>
>     Yes. Are there any questions or suggestions?
>
>
> What happens when there is no documentation supplied with the item?

In the clause (3), we assume that the item (i.e a binary file) is 
unusable for the development of other software. What kinds of 
situations or things do you worry about?

Thanks,
Yutaka