[License-review] For Legacy Approval: TOPPERS License

[Thorsten Glaser]

Josh Berkus dixit:

>However, this does raise a question.  Provision (3)(b) is not required;

Ah, I didn’t get the “either of the following two conditions”.
I *was* wondering…

>users can follow provision (3)(a).  I believe, in the case of the NASA
>license, we allowed that reporting to an entity was permissiable in an
>OSS license as long as it was optional.  In this case, it is optional.

Yes, of course, optional things may be present.

The disclaimer may be a bit over-broad and not hold up in all
countries, but that’s not per se a problem with the licence.
It looks free otherwise and can probably be approved.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
<igli> exceptions: a truly awful implementation of quite a nice idea.
<igli> just about the worst way you could do something like that, afaic.
<igli> it's like anti-design.  <mirabilos> that too… may I quote you on that?
<igli> sure, tho i doubt anyone will listen ;)