[License-review] CityWhisk Request for Approval of Apache 2.0 OSI License

Karl Fogel kfogel at red-bean.com
Tue May 6 16:59:26 UTC 2014

Marissa, this FAQ item may be useful to you:


Nuno Brito <nuno.brito at triplecheck.de> writes:
>Hi Marissa,
>I think there is some confusion.
>This mailing list is for reviewing the terms of licenses such as
>Apache 2.0 but not really intended for "approving" the software
>products that eventually make usage of these licenses.
>If you're the rightful owner of the software, then you can choose
>under which license terms the code is made available.
>Just an advice that I noted when looking at your code. I'd recommend
>to place on the header of each source code file a short text
>explaining who wrote the file and which licenses terms are applicable.
>You find an example here:
>If you need any help, you're welcome to just write me a direct email
>to keep the message exchange on this list focused on its charter.
>With kind regards,
>Nuno Brito
>spdx: http://triplecheck.de/download
>phone:  +49 615 146 03187
>On 2014-05-06 08:50, Marissa McDowell wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I would like to make a request for an Android mobile application
>> called CityWhisk to be licensed under Apache 2.0 as open source.  Our
>> code repo can be found at the following link: 
>> https://github.com/mjm24126/CityWhiskApp/ [1]
>> This is a first time approval request for our application and I'll be
>> happy to answer any other questions you have.
>> Thanks,
>> Marissa McDowell
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1] https://github.com/mjm24126/CityWhiskApp/
>> _______________________________________________
>> License-review mailing list
>> License-review at opensource.org
>> http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-review
>License-review mailing list
>License-review at opensource.org

More information about the License-review mailing list