[License-review] License Committee Report - for board meeting of 2013-11-06 [NASA, EUPL, and Tidepool]
fontana at sharpeleven.org
Mon Jun 30 18:51:03 UTC 2014
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:00:34 -0400
"Tzeng, Nigel H." <Nigel.Tzeng at jhuapl.edu> wrote:
> Special purpose licenses are by definition special and often (if not
> always) takes into consideration what entities will use such a
Okay, fair enough.
> As I saidŠrequest that NASA add "without specific prior written
> permission.² or similar text to end of the paragraph.
Sure, clearly something like that would address the concern I have.
> What bothers me particularly here is that your attitude is
> unnecessarily confrontational and you seem to be insinuating that
> Bryan is being somehow disingenous in asserting that such a
> requirement exists.
Sorry, I didn't mean to come across as confrontational. I also
certainly did not mean to suggest any disingenuousness.
More information about the License-review